<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mozy vs. Backblaze &#8211; The fight of the online backup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.petersendidit.com/post/mozy-vs-backblaze/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.petersendidit.com/post/mozy-vs-backblaze/</link>
	<description>blog of david petersen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:14:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: brentvw</title>
		<link>http://blog.petersendidit.com/post/mozy-vs-backblaze/comment-page-1/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>brentvw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.petersendidit.com/?p=51#comment-803</guid>
		<description>Hi I wanted to share this recent comparison review on the PC

http://brentvw.blogspot.com/2009/10/pc-computer-backup-mozy-is-superior-to.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi I wanted to share this recent comparison review on the PC</p>
<p><a href="http://brentvw.blogspot.com/2009/10/pc-computer-backup-mozy-is-superior-to.html" rel="nofollow">http://brentvw.blogspot.com/2009/10/pc-computer-backup-mozy-is-superior-to.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://blog.petersendidit.com/post/mozy-vs-backblaze/comment-page-1/#comment-666</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 03:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.petersendidit.com/?p=51#comment-666</guid>
		<description>could use something else that actually does support linux and mac or even windows.  You can use whatever client you want as long as it supports sftp transfers.  And it&#039;s only 2.99 a month for unlimted storage.

www.datastorageunit.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>could use something else that actually does support linux and mac or even windows.  You can use whatever client you want as long as it supports sftp transfers.  And it&#8217;s only 2.99 a month for unlimted storage.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.datastorageunit.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.datastorageunit.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivier</title>
		<link>http://blog.petersendidit.com/post/mozy-vs-backblaze/comment-page-1/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 09:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.petersendidit.com/?p=51#comment-439</guid>
		<description>one major difference between the two is for file size: Backcblaze is limited to 4GB per file, Mozy is unlimited.
Home video projects or other large files are hence a no-no on Backblaze.

I wish either one of hem would rush and get a Linux client out btw..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one major difference between the two is for file size: Backcblaze is limited to 4GB per file, Mozy is unlimited.<br />
Home video projects or other large files are hence a no-no on Backblaze.</p>
<p>I wish either one of hem would rush and get a Linux client out btw..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wisc</title>
		<link>http://blog.petersendidit.com/post/mozy-vs-backblaze/comment-page-1/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>wisc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.petersendidit.com/?p=51#comment-374</guid>
		<description>I have been using Mozy and was swearing by it until that 10.4+ glitch with the new update occured. It took them nearly 3 weeks to tell me to download and old version, but not without having to reupload all my files on which it is getting stuck at the moment, which is annoying the living hell out of me because i thought i could trust the system. The only problem I have with backblaze is the limited amount of trail time/no free space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using Mozy and was swearing by it until that 10.4+ glitch with the new update occured. It took them nearly 3 weeks to tell me to download and old version, but not without having to reupload all my files on which it is getting stuck at the moment, which is annoying the living hell out of me because i thought i could trust the system. The only problem I have with backblaze is the limited amount of trail time/no free space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petersendidit</title>
		<link>http://blog.petersendidit.com/post/mozy-vs-backblaze/comment-page-1/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>petersendidit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 19:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.petersendidit.com/?p=51#comment-345</guid>
		<description>As far as &quot;features&quot; Backblaze and Mozy are very close. One thing that Backblaze does have on Mozy is that Backblaze has the option of sending a external hard drive to you as one of their restore options.  That option is a big selling point if you have alot of data backed up.  I also found that even though Mozy says it supports external hard drives it doesn&#039;t seem to do that very well.  Backblase also seems to integrate in to the Mac OS much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as &#8220;features&#8221; Backblaze and Mozy are very close. One thing that Backblaze does have on Mozy is that Backblaze has the option of sending a external hard drive to you as one of their restore options.  That option is a big selling point if you have alot of data backed up.  I also found that even though Mozy says it supports external hard drives it doesn&#8217;t seem to do that very well.  Backblase also seems to integrate in to the Mac OS much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://blog.petersendidit.com/post/mozy-vs-backblaze/comment-page-1/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 04:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.petersendidit.com/?p=51#comment-312</guid>
		<description>Was just looking at this article since I am interested if Backblaze offers any significant features that Mozy didn&#039;t. I noticed that you wrote:

&quot;Mozy takes the schedule backup approach, you tell Mozy when you want it to run and it backs up everything that has changed at that scheduled time.&quot;

I have been using since 2006 on both Mac and Windows and know that while it can use scheduled backups, it can also be configured to back up when the computer is not in use based on all kinds of parameters to choose from (less than xx% usage, person away for more than xx minutes, minimum xx hours between backups).

Are there any other features of Backblaze that stick out that make you feel it is a vast improvement to Mozy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was just looking at this article since I am interested if Backblaze offers any significant features that Mozy didn&#8217;t. I noticed that you wrote:</p>
<p>&#8220;Mozy takes the schedule backup approach, you tell Mozy when you want it to run and it backs up everything that has changed at that scheduled time.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have been using since 2006 on both Mac and Windows and know that while it can use scheduled backups, it can also be configured to back up when the computer is not in use based on all kinds of parameters to choose from (less than xx% usage, person away for more than xx minutes, minimum xx hours between backups).</p>
<p>Are there any other features of Backblaze that stick out that make you feel it is a vast improvement to Mozy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Backups Review</title>
		<link>http://blog.petersendidit.com/post/mozy-vs-backblaze/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Backups Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.petersendidit.com/?p=51#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Great review of the two products!  In our reviews, Mozy and Backblaze are tied at the top, but everyone has their own experiences. I&#039;m glad you found something that works well for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review of the two products!  In our reviews, Mozy and Backblaze are tied at the top, but everyone has their own experiences. I&#8217;m glad you found something that works well for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ehren</title>
		<link>http://blog.petersendidit.com/post/mozy-vs-backblaze/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>ehren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 01:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.petersendidit.com/?p=51#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Based on your rec I tried BackBlaze...unfortunately it interprets Windows XP 64-bit as a &quot;Server Operating System&quot; and thanked me for trying anyway.  I didn&#039;t like Mozy that much either, it crumbled under 20 GB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on your rec I tried BackBlaze&#8230;unfortunately it interprets Windows XP 64-bit as a &#8220;Server Operating System&#8221; and thanked me for trying anyway.  I didn&#8217;t like Mozy that much either, it crumbled under 20 GB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
